Twenty five years ago, on this day, March 11th, 2001,
The Federal Government is spending $3.9 million on an advertising campaign on greenhouse gases featuring celebrity gardener Don Burke, two months after criticism of its $3.6 million ad campaign on the Natural Heritage Trust.
In the ads, on prime-time television and in newspapers, Burke says: “I love greenhouses. Wouldn’t want to live in one, though … and that’s why the Commonwealth Government is doing something about it.”
They're investing $200 million a year to lower greenhouse gases. They're working with over 300 major companies, helping them to clean up their act.'' He goes on to introduce 10 ways Australians can make a difference including turning off the TV at the power point, instead of using the remote, washing clothes in cold water and taking shorter showers. The Opposition's environment spokesman, Senator Nick Bolkus, said yesterday the ad campaign was anoutrageous abuse of taxpayers’ money”.
… The Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office confirmed the full cost of the advertising campaign was $3.9 million, with the ads to run for six weeks.
2001 Clennell, A. 2001. Pitched Battle Over Don Burke Ads. Sydney Morning Herald, 13 March, p.5.
AND
CELEBRITY green tea thumb Don Burke yesterday defended his decision to promote the Federal Government’s anti-greenhouse gas policy on television, saying he was no apologist for the Liberals.
The Opposition and the Australian Democrats voiced concern over Mr Burke’s promotion of the Government’s approach to greenhouse problems in a $3.9 million print and broadcast campaign.
But Mr Burke, who did the job free of charge, praised the Government for making a start and said he would also support similar Labor efforts.
“I knew in doing this … the Opposition would come back with various statements. As I say, I’m not an apologist for the Liberal Party.”
Daily Telegraph, March 14, 2001 p20
The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was roughly 371ppm. As of 2026 it is 428ppm, but
check here for daily measures.
The broader context was that the Liberal Party had gone into the 1990 federal election with a more ambitious carbon dioxide emissions reduction target than the governing Labor party, but this had not gotten them over the line; they very narrowly lost, and felt that they had been betrayed by green groups, especially the Australian Conservation Foundation. This exacerbated pre-existing suspicions and antipathy to all things environmental. In 1996 the Liberals had come back to power, and new Prime Minister John Howard had made it pretty clear that he had contempt for the issue of climate change and those pushing it. I could go on for days….
The specific context was that thanks to the Millennium drought and so forth, concerns about climate change were growing. And so as an attempt at perception management, Howard had used taxpayer money to do an advertising campaign fronted by then popular TV personality Don Burke, who did gardening shows.
What I think we can learn from this is that even assholes, or especially assholes, will use public funds to try and fool the public. It’s like that cartoon of the two fat men at the table, and one of them cuts off the tail of the dog nearby and feeds the dog its own tail. It’s actually worse than that, of course. Anyway…
What happened next the Don Burke controversy blew up because Labor and the Democrats (the Democrats still a thing) were not at all happy, and launched parliamentary investigations and so on. The Greens were just becoming a thing by then.
Burke himself, well, here’s Wikipedia:
He has been an outspoken critic of numerous environmental advocacy groups. From July 2005 to late 2008,[3] Burke was the Chair of the climate-change-denying Australian Environment Foundation.[4]
then revealed to be. Well…
An investigation started when journalist Tracey Spicer announced on Twitter that she was investigating the sexual harassment by powerful men in the Australian entertainment industry. Spicer said, “One name kept recurring –
Don Burke”.[8][9] On 26 November 2017, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and The Sydney Morning Herald published a joint investigative piece containing claims that Burke had sexually harassed, sexually assaulted, and bullied women throughout his television career. The report quotes alleged female victims, as well as both female and male witnesses, including David Leckie—the former head of the Nine Network, on which Burke’s programs
aired—comparing Burke to American producer Harvey Weinstein.[8] Kate McClymont, Lorna Knowles, Tracey Spicer and Alison Branley received a
Walkley Award for their investigation.[10]
Other former Channel Nine executives went “on the record” to comment on
the allegations.
Sam Chisholm said, “Don Burke was a disgrace because of his behaviour internally and externally. This precluded him from ever becoming a major
star.”[11]
Peter Meakin said, “There was gossip about inappropriate language and he
was incredibly demanding. If someone fell short of the mark, he would excoriate them. He was unforgiving.”[11]
In response to the allegations, Burke released a lengthy statement which said he was “deeply hurt and outraged at the false and defamatory claims” and suggested the “baseless” claims were from former employees who “bear
grudges against me”. Burke also stated that he has had a “life-long opposition to sexism and misogyny”.[11]
Burke claimed to have self-diagnosed Asperger’s syndrome and, in a media
interview[12] following revelations about his alleged misconduct, said that these “genetic failings” were to blame for some of his conduct. In response, Autism Awareness Australia stated that Burke’s claim was “beyond appalling”
and “gobsmacking”.[13]
In the following days, many celebrities came forward to recount their
observations of Burke’s sexist and offensive behaviour, including Susie O’Neill,[14] Kerri-Anne Kennerley,[15] Di Morrissey, Debra Byrne, Tottie Goldsmith, Amity Dry and Mike Carlton.[16]
Following the interview on A Current Affair,[17] one of the women sued Burke for defamation on the grounds that he said she had lied about the sexual harassment allegation and that she made the false allegation as part of a “witch hunt” during the interview. She lost the case on the grounds that Justice David Mossop did not find Burke’s denial in the interview was credible, so viewers would not conclude that she was a liar or part of a
witch hunt, and thus was not defamed.[18][19]
And the emissions kept climbing despite all the advertising campaign bullshit, Howard tried
again in 2007 with “climate clever” adverts. But by then, he was toast.
What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong?
Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.
References
Xxx
Also on this day:
March 11, 1959 – Warmer Arctic Raising World’s Sea Level…
March 11, 1969 – NASA explains need to monitor C02 build-up to politicians
March 11, 1989 – warm words at The Hague, where the climate criminals should be sent…
March 11, 2008 – Australia’s ratification of Kyoto Protocol comes into effect