Categories
anti-reflexivity Australia

January 8, 1991 – Peter Walsh versus a habitable planet (Walsh wins)

Thirty five years ago, on this day, January 8th, 1991, former Federal Treasurer Peter Walsh lets rip,

BACK in 1989 a proposal to spend $6 million on an Australian response to the greenhouse effect and climatic change was being considered. The 1990 Budget Papers identify another $17 million for climate change core research and “multifaceted programme initiatives” – which presumably includes funding various national and international greenhouse conferences so beloved by greenhouse activists.

Walsh, P. 1991. Credibility Gap in Greenhouse Gabfests. Australian Financial Review, 8 January, p.7.

BASED ON DALY GREENHOUSE TRAP

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was roughly 355ppm. As of 2026 it is 428ppm, but check here for daily measures. 

The context was  that the Hawke government’s Cabinet had, in October 1990 created the interim planning target of a 20% reduction in the CO2 emissions by 2005 with the notable caveats that it didn’t hurt the economy and that other nations took similar action, i.e., “we’re not going to do it.” And even these caveats were not enough for people like Walsh, who regarded environmentalism as akin to paganism, astrology, whatever. 

What’s interesting about this is that the column is based largely on a then-new book called The Greenhouse Trap by a guy called John Daly. So you see here the mechanics of how a book, even if basically self published, can get picked up and used in speeches and opinion columns and reverberate and become part of the actual or possible “common sense”, or certainly part of the acceptable range of opinions. Blah, blah, Overton Window, blah, blah – there’s a kind of conveyor belt going on.

What I think we can learn from this  is that Old White Men have a lot of cultural power, or at least influence.

What happened next

Walsh kept ranting –  February 23, 1993 – Peter Walsh spouting his tosh again – All Our Yesterdays

Walsh was involved in the dimbulb denialist outfit the Lavoisier Group, and Daly kept on being daily until he died in January 2004.

And the gab fests, as Walsh called them, became meaningless, principally because the United States insisted that targets and timetables not be included in the treaty text of the UN Convention.

What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.

References

Xxx

Also on this day: 

January 8, 1968 – LaMont Cole to AAAS about running outta oxygen, build-up of C02 etc

January 8, 2003 –  Energy firms plan to “bury carbon emissions”…

January 8, 2013 –  Australian Prime Minister connects bush fires and #climate change

January 8, 2018 – Joe Root doesn’t come back to bat

Categories
Activism

January 8, 2016 – Exxon versus a habitable planet (Exxon wins)

Ten years ago today – 

“A small coalition of prominent climate change activists and political operatives huddled on Jan. 8 [2016] for a closed-door meeting at the Rockefeller Family Fund in Manhattan. Their agenda: taking down oil giant ExxonMobil through a coordinated campaign of legal action, divestment efforts, and political pressure.” 

https://freebeacon.com/issues/memo-shows-secret-coordination-effort-exxonmobil-climate-activists-rockefeller-fund/ 

and

see also here

https://www.eenews.net/articles/private-eye-behind-exxonknew-hacking-scheme-faces-jail-time

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was roughly 355ppm. As of 2026 it is 428ppm, but check here for daily measures. 

The broader context was that in the late 1970s Exxon’s scientists got their heads around carbon dioxide build-up (this was not top secret – see the CO2 Newsletter!). But the corporation pivoted in the mid-1980s to, well, funding denial because that’s the growth imperative, isn’t it?

The specific context was that even though the laws are made by the rich to constrain the poor, they offer some kind of venue, sometimes, to blunt/slow our acceleration off the cliff. Maybe. And here we are.

What I think we can learn from this is that we’re fubarred and Cocker Protocol is the only protocol.

What happened next

Well, a news outlet funded by the IPAA is gloating – 

A Decade of Defeat: The Rockefeller-Funded Climate Crusade on the Road to Nowhere

Ten years ago, a subpoena from then New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman launched the Rockefeller-funded legal crusade against America’s energy industry. This week marks a decade since the news broke about the case – but you won’t hear activists bragging about it this week.

That’s probably because their so-called “trial of the century” ended in spectacular defeat. What was supposed to be a game-changing lawsuit instead became the first in a long string of dismissed cases – in a campaign defined by courtroom flops, sketchy funding schemes, and millions in wasted taxpayer dollars.

Now, ten years later, the story is reaching a full circle moment. The U.S. Supreme Court is weighing whether to review a case brought by Colorado municipalities that could determine the fate of this climate lawfare. A ruling could close the chapter on a ten-year campaign that has repeatedly failed from the start.

Ultimately, the campaign’s setbacks are primarily grounded in courts’ recognition of the weak legal theories and unfounded claims, but its lack of success also shines light on how politics and public priorities have shifted over the decade.

Also on this day: 

January 8, 1968 – LaMont Cole to AAAS about running outta oxygen, build-up of C02 etc

January 8, 2003 –  Energy firms plan to “bury carbon emissions”…

January 8, 2013 –  Australian Prime Minister connects bush fires and #climate change

January 8, 2018 – Joe Root doesn’t come back to bat

Categories
Book Reviews

Book Review: The Afterlife Project

Below is a review of The Afterlife Project by Tim Weed, kindly written by @kinkeeper.bsky.social.

Articles that appear in my doom-scroll feed about the destruction of our Earth’s natural resources get skimmed, compartmentalized, repressed, and rapidly filed in the “End of World” folder on my email server. (Until mid-2025, the file was named “End of World?” with a question mark.) I have not been able to bring myself to read books on this issue either. They gather dust on my bookshelves, as a matter of self-preservation.

But since the destruction of our only home is now obviously exponential in nature (In nature! Ha!), and in combination with the rapid and shocking downfall of my home country’s democracy that includes deliberate dismantling of Earth-care acts in the name of money and power, I am opening my psyche’s doors to all of the emotions. Go big, go home, and go to a therapist who believes that climate change is real.

Being that Everything is DoomedTM, I am cracking into my untouched trove of Cli-Fi and Cli-Nonfi. I began with The Afterlife Project, by Tim Weed.

It is a used copy, intentionally purchased at a local independent bookstore; no additional production at the expense of resources, and no 2-day delivery by a company overseen by a human who is hellbent on hoarding wealth and power rather than saving our planetary home.

As I shuffled through the bright book covers on my To Be Read shelf, I picked The Afterlife Project first, merely because the cover art reflected my mood at that time: calm, muted, and a bit blurred at the edges. The content within, however, was far from muted or blurred.

If you’ve ever watched a movie about the restaurant industry, (such as Chef or Julie & Julia), you’ll notice that a good director will fill your eyes with the most sumptuous visuals of food. Vegan mouths water because of that slo-mo shot of a chef slicing brisket. Dairy intolerant folks shed tears over the sizzling visuals of cheese melting on a griddle. Stomachs rumble, the pause button on the remote is punched, and refrigerators are raided.

This is much like reading The Afterlife Project. The lush descriptions of 11th millennium Earth and its flora and fauna made me yearn to drop everything and just go. Go…out. Anywhere. Somewhere. A place of green and clean air and toes in dirt and sounds that overlap into a cacophony of life.

While reading, one can’t help but think “this is how Earth is supposed to be and humans are definitely not the superior species here.” The lush narration within The Afterlife Project conjures smells, sounds, textures, and visuals of a planet that should be, of soil that we should long to kneel upon, of animals that deserve to live unfettered by the whims of humans. (For all of our self aggrandizing about our technological and industrial accomplishments, it remains to be seen how increasing amounts of cement and glass can compare to the luxury of untouched nature.) If you’re a city kid, I challenge you to read this book and not have a mustard seed of desire for nature sprout within your hurried heart.

After one particular mind-bending imaginative trip through an 11th millennium Earth forest (a literal trip thanks to the character’s experimentation with Amanita muscaria fungi), a certain sentence punched me in the gut: “Now that humanity is pretty much out of the picture, has the torch of sentience been passed on to some other being?” This musing can really get to you, if you let it. And you should let it, as the author follows with the character’s realization that his life is deeply connected to that which surrounds him: he has not been alone in the woods after all…he is surrounded by life, sometimes unseen but always felt.

And just how did 11th millennium Earth come to be in such a state of untouched beauty in The Afterlife Project? The causes of humanity’s demise and subsequent flourishing of non-human life on Earth are not the main points of the book. Although, when discussed, the causes are uncomfortably familiar or tangential to the content of our actual reality: every climate scientist’s post on BlueSky, every book written by experts which apparently are screams into the void.

The main character eventually absorbs into his very being, his very soul, that the world around him is his life and his life is the world around him. As it should be. Imagine if every human on Earth worshipped our only home in the way it deserved. Just imagine.

Someday, humanity deserves to see this book translated in big screen format. I have specific demands for this theatrical rendition: Christopher Nolan will direct, the trailer song will be “Below Sea Level” by Ben Harper, and the main character will be played by some random person not yet famous (someone unrecognizable to the general public, as to create a sense of “this could be me perhaps this is all of us”.) I want my fellow humans to see the indescribable beauty of what happens when a single human loves the Earth with his whole being.

These are my demands as I close the bent cover of The Afterlife Project and tuck it away on my Keep Forever bookshelf. And I think the point here is…Tim Weed made it beautifully and painfully clear: we don’t have forever.

Categories
France NotClimate

January 7, 1938 – Samuel Beckett stabbed #NotClimate

On this day, January 7, in 1938

Then, echoing the random absurdism of his novel, on 7 January 1938, Beckett was stabbed in the chest and nearly killed in a Paris street when he refused the solicitations of a notorious pimp, named “Prudent”. Joyce arranged for medical treatment, and Beckett received his page proofs in hospital where he made a few alterations and insertions. https://onehundredpages.wordpress.com/2024/07/24/murphy-by-samuel-beckett-1938-the-maestro-of-failure/

Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were at xxx parts per million.

As of 2026 they are ppm at and rising rapidly.  Enjoy yourself, it’s later than you think. 

Btw, the point(s) of this project is ….  the how, the who the hell am I and the what do I currently believe?

The context was

Beckett had been living in Paris for a couple of years by this time, I think. He’d been under analysis with Wilfrid Bion (watch this space)

Why care?

Well, knowing this about an author can change the way you read them?  (Some say it shouldn’t, obvs – nothing outside the text blah blah).

(How) does it connect to climate change?

Beckett’s sense of the absurd, despair, but also ACTION.

“Where I am, I don’t know, I’ll never know, in the silence you don’t know, you must go on, I can’t go on, I’ll go on.”

What happened next

He kept despairing and going on.

How does it help us understand the world?

Oof. Beckett and Bion – I must really get on with that…

How does it help us act in the world?

Beckett’s sense of the absurd, despair, but also ACTION.

“Where I am, I don’t know, I’ll never know, in the silence you don’t know, you must go on, I can’t go on, I’ll go on.”

There was the Austrian playwright, Otto Von Horvath who died in Paris on June 1 1938 when a branch of a tree fell on his head, as I recall, about the same time, pre war. Paris, of course, people didn’t know it was pre war, necessarily. They had a fairly good guess but didn’t know it was “pre-occupation Paris”,  (see what I did there?)

. I presume a lot of them had a mental model that it would be a rerun of World War One, only with bigger explosions.

Anyway, Sword of Damocles in it all our lives are hanging by a thread/ending of Stand by Me by the late great Rob Reiner 

The source that it comes from, if necessary, 

Xxx

The other things that you could read about this or watch 

I should read the Molloy trilogy – I stared Malone Dies without realising it’s mid…

What do you think?

If you have opinions or info about this, or other things that happened on this day that are worth knowing, let me know!

Also on this day

January 7 – Wikipedia

January 7 – WCH | Stories

Categories
On This Day

On this Day: January 7th – Intersectionality, geoengineering, warnings and activism.

Fifty six years ago the activists at “Ecology Action East” were drawing the links and parallels. These days it would be smothered in the language of “climate justice” etc. But back then, they had simpler terms.

  January 7, 1970 – “Ecology Action East” is “intersectional”

Twenty two years ago today, scientists think we might be able to use our technology to avoid the worst. What could go wrong?

January 7, 2004 – geoengineering our way outa trouble?

Twenty years ago today, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, with a basic website, warn of trouble ahead.

January 7, 2006 – Bureau of Meteorology with another climate warning

Thirteen years ago today, an activist takes a chance.  (See interview here.)

January 7, 2013 – Australian climate activist pretends to be ANZ bank, with spectacular results  

Are there other climate-related events that happened on this day that you think deserve a shout out? If so, let me know.

As ever, invite me on your podcast, etc etc.

Categories
NotClimate

January 6, 1854 – Sherlock Holmes “born” #NotClimate

On this day, January 6th,  in 1854

“[Sherlock] Holmes is generally considered to have been born on 6 Jan 1854. ” https://craigjanacek.wordpress.com/2015/09/13/a-chronological-order-of-sherlock-holmes-stories/

Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were at 285 parts per million.

As of 2026 they are 428ppm at and rising rapidly.  Enjoy yourself, it’s later than you think. 

Btw, the point(s) of this project is ….  the how, the who the hell am I and the what do I currently believe?

The context was that Arthur Conan Doyle was making a go of it as a writer when, in 1891, he invented Sherlock Holmes, who has become a global phenomenon

Why care?

You really don’t need to!  

(How) does it connect to climate change?

Hmm, let me think on that…

What happened next

Doyle wrote 56 stories and four novels (he did try to kill the character off, but had to bring him back)

How does it help us understand the world?

This factoid? Not at all.  But Holmes in general? Maybe?

How does it help us act in the world?

Yeah, maybe it doesn’t?

The source that it comes from, if necessary, 

See above

The other things that you could read about this or watch 

In 2026 I am committed to reading all 56 short stories and the four novels, and blog them. That will bring you enlightenment, oh yes.

What do you think?

If you have opinions or info about this, or other things that happened on this day that are worth knowing, let me know!

Also on this day

Wikipedia

January 6 – WCH | Stories

What Happened on January 6 | HISTORY

Categories
Science Scientists United States of America

January 6th, 1982 – AAAS meeting warns about carbon dioxide build-up

On this day 43 years ago, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (created 1848) held its annual meeting, this time in Washington DC.  The climatologists held panels within that.

They were pretty blunt about what was on the way.

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was roughly 382ppm. As of 2026 it is 425ppm, but check here for daily measures. 

The broader context was the AAAS had been around for a long long time. By the late 1960s its annual gatherings were a site for scientific discussion of what was coming (see here and here).

The specific context was by the late 1970s the climate scientists were beginning to get sure of the eventual result of tipping huge amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere (though they varied on time frames). AAAS was involved.

Efforts to get policymakers interested had had some success, but it all fell in a heap after the Reagan Administration came in in January 1981.

What I think we can learn from this is that we have known for a long time. This. Was. Not. A. State. Secret.

[LINK]

What happened next. The climate stuff at the AAAS meeting was covered in newspapers around the US, sometimes featuring quite prominently. The scientific work continued. And continued.

1988 was the pivotal year. [LINK]

What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.

References

Xxx

Also on this day

January 6, 1883 – The New York Times reports on the Atmosphere

January 6, 1989 – “Cloud-Radiative Forcing and Climate: Results from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment” 

January 6, 1995 –  Australian business interests battle a carbon tax with “nobody else is acting” argument

Categories
CO2 Newsletter

CO2 Newsletter Vol. 1 no. 1 (Oct 1979) is live!

The first edition of the CO2 Newsletter, published bi-monthly by American geologist William N. Barbat between 1979 and 1982 is live!

You can download a pdf and see the full text here.

Barbat had switched on to environmental problems over a decade earlier, including carbon dioxide build-up. In 1979 he started the Newsletter. It was intended to fill a

“communications gap by capsulizing both the published and unpublished reports on the CO2 problem which are deemed important. This newsletter will also publish original material. invited articles. and letters of inquiry, fact and opinion.”

Each 8 page Newsletter had a lead story, an editorial, excerpts of recent documents (reports, newspaper articles, scientific abstracts, testimony by scientists to Congressional hearings) and deeply researched and argued articles by Barbat about a range of issues. Most issues had feedback from readers.

The 18 Newsletters are heart-breaking and enraging because it is clear that by the late 1970s many scientists knew what was coming, but they – and Barbat – were not able to get enough other people to take it seriously (sound familiar?)

I will be releasing the Newsletters on roughly 3 week cycles through the year, and also blogging about specific aspects of each newsletter between these release dates.

Please give me feedback, even if it is merely typos you’ve found in the html versions of the pdfs

Finally, a thank you to the member of the late William N. Barbat’s family who very kindly supplied copies of the Newsletter, their time to answer questions and also permission for these wonderful (and, again, heart-breaking) documents to be shared.

Categories
Denial Science Scientists

January 5th, 2006 – James Hansen interviewed on Sixty Minutes

On this day 20 years ago, climate scientist James Hansen, being censored and bullied left right and centre by Bush administration appointees, breaks a sixteen year silence with the media and says yes to a request to appear on the CBS show Sixty Minutes.

Jim spent the morning of the first interview, January 5, 2006, in his apartment, completing his email about ethics to Einaudi and Leshin. He remembers feeling nervous as he walked the few blocks to his office for the filming. “I wondered if I shouldn’t just talk about the science, but then I decided, ‘To hell with this. This has got to be illegal.’ I would be blunt and not hold anything back.”

Source –  Bowen Censoring Science p. 55

and

“As a government scientist, James Hansen is taking a risk. He says there are things the White House doesn’t want you to hear but he’s going to say them anyway. Hansen is arguably the world’s leading researcher on global warming. He’s the head of NASA’s top institute studying the climate. This imminent scientist says that the Bush administration is restricting who he can talk to and editing what he can say. Politicians, he says, are rewriting the science. Scott Pelley reports.”

[source]

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was roughly 382ppm. As of 2026 it is 428ppm, but check here for daily measures. 

The broader context was that governments, at the behest of the powerful interests that either control them or “influence them significantly” (depends on the facts, and also the perspective of the commentator!), have always silenced inconvenient voices – “who will rid me of this troublesome priest” etc etc. 

The specific context was that James Hansen had first felt the ire of a Republican administration in 1981 when the front page story on the New York Times in August resulted in already-issued grant funding being pulled from GISS. Hansen kickstarted climate concern with his June 23 1988 testimony to Congress. He found himself mysteriously not invited to various important policy meetings in the following years, and his testimony to Congress subtly altered/suppressed. By 2006 the Bush Jnr administration was fighting a rear-guard action, since the Kyoto PRotocol had finally been ratified by enough nations the previous year to become “law” (well, lore, really), and negotiations for a successor were underway.  The censorship and harassment of Hansen, laid out in Bowen’s book, was part of that.

What I think we can learn from this is that the powerful like to stay powerful, and suppress voices that are telling stark truths, as best they can.

What happened next Hansen retired, and started getting arrested.

Hansen is still working as a scientist and the stuff he is saying is frankly terrifying. I am glad I am closer to the grave than the cradle, because there are some shitstorms on their way.

What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.

References

Bowen, M. 2008. Censoring Science: Inside The Political Attack On Dr. James Hansen And The Truth Of Global Warming.

January 5, 1973 –  An academic article about the Arctic emerges from the Met Office

January 5, 1989 – National Academy of Science tries to chivvy Bush.

January 5, 1995 – Victorian premier comes out against carbon tax – All Our Yesterdays

January 5, 2006 – strategic hand-wringing about “Our Drowning Neighbours”

Categories
France NotClimate

January 14, 1858- The Orsini Affair #NotClimate

On this day, January 14, in 1858

The Orsini affair comprised the diplomatic, political and legal consequences of the “Orsini attempt” (French: attentat d’Orsini): the attempt made on 14 January 1858 by Felice Orsini, with other Italian nationalists and backed by English radicals, to assassinate Napoleon III in Paris.[1]

Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were at 286 parts per million.

As of 2026 they are 428ppm at and rising rapidly. Enjoy yourself, it’s later than you think. 

Btw, the point(s) of this project is …. the how, the who the hell am I and the what do I currently believe?

The context was one of Italian nationalism shenanigans, and the British elite figures resistance to a state that overly-policed those who lived in England (I know, I know).

Why care?

I can’t think of a good reason here.

(How) does it connect to climate change?

It does not.

What happened next

The conspirators got executed.

There was a panic in the UK about the lack of a decent army to defend the Heart of the Empire, and volunteer brigades formed… There was the National Rifle Association, which was the inspiration for the (very different)US one.

How does it help us understand the world?

Well, it was news to me, but my knowledge of European history is not nearly as solid as I used to think it was

How does it help us act in the world?

I”f you’re going to come at the king, you best not miss”

The source that it comes from, if necessary, 

Xxx

The other things that you could read about this or watch 

Xx

Zola – His Excellency Eugène Rougon

What do you think?

If you have opinions or info about this, or other things that happened on this day that are worth knowing, let me know!

Also on this day

Wikipedia

Working Class History

Etc