Categories
Podcasts Weather modification

Podcast review: “Weaponising the Weather” with Jim Fleming

This half hour interview – Weaponizing the Weather | CNA – from the “Coming in from the Cold” podcast is worth your time if you are interested in the history of US efforts to control the weather (not a conspiracy, yes humans did get boots on the moon).

The guest, Jim Fleming, wrote – among other things – Fixing the Sky.

Bits I took –

19th century weather modification con-artists.

Post WW2 – GE heavily into weather modification until their lawyers told them they were opening themselves up to all sorts of law suits.

US Weather Bureau chief Harry Wexler as a mensch (his life cut short) and his 1958 article in Science “Modifying Weather on a Large Scale”

Edward Lorenz speech in November 1960 in Tokyo basically saying you weren’t gonna be able to control the weather because it’s not just complex but chaotic.

There’s lots of other good stuff (Project Storm Fury etc etc).

In doing the link-hunting for this post I found this – women denied credit for their work? Eh, how is this possible? A very rare instance, thankfully…

The Hidden Heroines of Chaos | Quanta Magazine

Categories
Podcasts

Podcast review: Ro Randall and the coming Overshoot…

Ro Randall is one of the greats. You have probably never heard of her, but she is one of the greats. She is a retired psychoanalyst who has had super-useful things to say about the psycho-dynamics of community groups, climate change (see a review of her great novel about climate activism, hope, despair etc Transgression here and interviews with her at the foot of this post.

I just listened to a 2022 interview she did on the podcast “Bridging the Carbon Gap” a series I have already raved about here and here.

What makes this one interesting (to me), beyond her clarity and deployment of terms like “finite pool of worry [see here about contrary evidence for instead a finite pool of attention”] and bringing of her decades of knowledge and experience to the questions posed her, is that she is really trying to find out what her interviewers think and feel, and even being willing to suggest that they are seeing-but-not-seeing what is going on.

Randall’s comments on climate and the curriculum (a question the interviewers ask all guests, with varying degrees of success) are also very much worth your time.

Meanwhile, I listened to the “teaser” trailer for a new 4 part podcast series called Overshoot: Navigating a world beyond 1.5 degrees, which launches on Monday 6th October.

Overshoot is one of those words that you’re hearing more of.  My first real encounter was in about 2000, when I read, (and was convinced by, tbh) the fairly Malthusian 1980 book by WIlliam R. Catton Jr. More recently it is a Malm and Carton book.  The gist of the podcast series is “Well, Paris has failed [Paris was always going to fail – see what I wrote in 2015 about the institutional reasons it was hyped”] so, you know,  ‘now what?”


It will be interesting to see if they tackle the reasons for the failure – not of states and corporations: that is kind of obvious/inevitable – but the more difficult and distressing (because not inevitable) failures of social movements.  We shall see (well, hear).

2013 interview

2020 interview

2021

Categories
Podcasts

Four podcasts and an ongoing funeral (for the hairless murder apes)

Opinions vary on podcasts and their utility (1). Me, I use them so I’m not alone with my thoughts – what a yikes that would be – while I feed moorhens (2).

Besides Letter from An American (Sept 26 was brilliant – on what the ‘Battle’ of Wounded Knee actually was) there are four others worth your time

On a recent Bridging the Carbon Gap Peter Sikora is clear and blunt about what ‘climate’ activism can achieve, can’t, the barriers. I loved his pushback on the whole notion of hope.

Two from a new series called The Energy Revolution are particularly on good on the UK situation. The podcast is

“Hosted by Sulaiman Ilyas-Jarrett, former Head of Policy and Strategy for Renewable Electricity Delivery at the UK Department for Energy and Senior Advisor at No10 Downing Street. He is now a Policy Fellow at the University of Cambridge Centre for Science and Policy.”

First there was “1800 to the present” with “Arthur Downing, Director of Strategy at Octopus and author of the forthcoming book Power and the People: a history of energy in Britain since 1800.” A wide-ranging discussion – the stuff that resonated most for me (don’t forget, I am a history geek) was about the four phases of the UK energy system over the last 200 years.

Then today I listened to Simon Evans, who was at ENDS but has been at Carbon Brief for the last decade or so. A really useful conversation about the nature of the UK media. My intuitions – that the FT is v. good and the Telegraph is comedically bad (Private Eye have been covering its descent into total swivel-eyed lunacy) – were backed up, so we both must be right. Predictably no conversation about the deeper ways of thinking about why the media is the way it is- Herman and Chomsky’s Propaganda Model, for example (which, to be clear, is not the be all and end all, but is a useful tool to think/see with).

Finally, Chris Hayes “Why is this Happening?” had a really interesting guest, Costa Samaras, who was neck deep in the Biden Administrations Inflation Reduction Act (a huge effort to fund green technologies etc). Samaras clearly knows his stuff (he is an energy wonk’s wonk) and – which does not always follow – is able to communicate complexity without descending into jargon and waffle.  An extremely useful hour. Only irritation was the idea that some of what Trump’s gang (it should surely really be called the VoughtMiller gang?) “makes no sense”  – for example ending a 7 billion dollar scheme to get poor/marginalised communities installing rooftop solar.

It makes perfect sense if you want captive consumers. I am reminded (as I often am) of the Stamford Raffles anecdote by permaculture guy Bill Mollison.

When Sir Stamford Raffles went to Singapore, he went by way of Indonesia and saw how self-reliant people were with the palms that provided them with everything they needed. He said ‘These people are ungovernable’. There was nothing the government could give them that they wanted or needed. So what had to be done was clear. Cut the fucking palms down, so they became dependent, and hence governable. You can’t govern independent people. They have no need of anything you can bring them.”

So, anyway, all four are very much worth your time.  Alongside Letter from an American, obvs.

Footnotes

(1) “To anaesthetize people? To feel they’re learning something? To put them to sleep. So they can exercise and not feel like idiots. Occasionally to learn something. To keep themselves entertained while doing busy work of some kind.”

(2) But I should be doing more narrating of vomit drafts.

Categories
Academia Activism Podcasts

Podcast: “Bridging the Carbon Gap – Adam Aron psychological insights for building the climate movement”

This one you should listen to. I listen to a lot of podcasts, especially on climate and energy (policy, politics, etc) and they are mostly very very mid (at best).  Here’s a recent rant about the whys of that.

This one (and another, to be reviewed soon) was the exception and perhaps almost exceptional.


It’s by a bunch of 17 year old Americans. To repeat myself , smart 17 year olds are potentially a very good source of info because they

a) have more skin in the game re: 2nd half of the 21st century

b) haven’t had obedience beaten into them by The System (“man”).

It’s a podcast by City Atlas. Who they? Well, City Altas

“was founded to help New Yorkers and the public everywhere understand and prepare for the future, as described in the reports of the IPCC, C40.org, and the New York City Panel on Climate Change (NPCC), and to strengthen the democratic process towards equitable responses to climate change. Our emphasis is on building public energy and climate literacy as a way to create support for a fast transition to a zero carbon world.”

They interview a guy called Professor Adam Aron, (personal website here) who was on one academic track (cognitive neuroscience) and has recently jumped to another (the psychology of collective action).

They interview Aron about, well, building social movements and for once from an academic it isn’t banalities, generalities and apple pie.

The transcript (not quite tidy and unhyperlinked – I have added those) is here.

The first bit that made me sit up and take real notice was this

“There’s a very beautiful example of this, given there’s a book called Let This Radicalize You by Haber and Kaba,  two women of color in Chicago. And in one of the chapters, I think, Kelly Hays describes how they’re busy, Miriam tries to bring her into a struggle to try and get restitution for victims of torture by the Chicago Police. It’s called reparations. Now this is back in 2014 and in that chapter, Kelly explains, you know, I didn’t think we could win. There’s no way that we would win this thing, but I nevertheless joined Miriam in her struggle anyway, even though I very much doubted we could win, in fact, they ended up winning. They actually ended up getting restitution from the Chicago Police. Kind of amazing story. So why did Kelly join Miriam? And she says, Well, I joined Miriam because I thought it would be meaningful and generative. We had a history of trust. I thought I would have an adventure. I thought that I would learn things by doing the process. I thought that I would discover sort of the limits of my courage. I would develop new skills. So I think this phenomenon of social obligation to each other and how we build that in small groups is kind of a key part of how to get the larger social mobilization.”

On the barriers facing academics (YO, THIERRY!)

“we actually published a paper last year in 2024 with first authors, Fabian Dablander, a brilliant young guy from the Netherlands and colleagues. And it was a survey of over 9000 academics and scientists, sort of trying to understand, you know, what are the barriers to them acting”

Aron isn’t pollyann-ish about the difficulties facing us as a species, and the barriers facing social movement organisations.

“But I think more broadly, there’s a whole suite of issues, the sort of lonely, atomized and fragmented reality in which we find ourselves. I referred to that earlier. This kind of I’m all alone and with my family in my house, or, you know, everything society is telling me, I just need to get ahead and get my brand and develop myself as an entrepreneur, I’m kind of deterritorialized from the place, I don’t belong anywhere. I’m a consumer. I’m locked in this kind of, you know, hyper-consumption machine, and I just need to kind of selfishly take care of myself. I mean, there’s enormous pressures on people to have that attitude psychologically. I think that is one of our major barriers, and one of the major reasons people aren’t acting, but I think also people don’t know what to do, even people who completely get that global heating is caused by the burning of fossil fuels, who understand, as many adults do, who have children, that this is really a threat now to people’s livelihoods and wellbeing and their kids lives in the next few decades, people don’t know what to do. I think that’s a really that gets back to a bigger question you asked me about, how do we mobilize the wider society? Because there’s myriad things people can do, but we really need them to act together towards really strong policy.”


Sure, he doesn’t talk about emotacycles or the smugosphere, or ego-fodderification, but what kind of depressive maniac does that anyway.

Does the interviewer always follow up on the interesting stuff Aron says? No, she sticks to her list of questions but a) that’s okay and b) they are good questions.  Over time, I suspect she will develop the skills and confidence start to go down (and come out of) rabbit holes with interviewees. (NB there is absolutely nothing wrong with what she is doing now).

Is this podcast worth your time? This episode, hell yes, and I have high hopes for the others in the series.

Categories
Podcasts

Podcast reviews: authoritarianism, IRA and writing climate… and the hypocrite-zealot trap

As per last review Boiling Point, the LA Times podcast on climate, remains a must listen.

In the latest episode “Fighting Climate Change in an Authoritarian Age” (29 mins) Sammy Roth interviews James McCarthy, a geographer at Clark University. It’s nicely done. McCarthy references a 2019 special issue of the Annals of American Association of Geographers.

Here’s his editorial – Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Environment: Comparative Experiences, Insights, and Perspectives

And here’s the table of contents of the issue itself.

The “Energy Gang” is for energy (policy) wonks, and owned by Wood McKenzie, but usually good value (it gets a bit breathless sometimes, falling into horse-races and hype, as these sorts of podcasts are wont to do). This one – “It’s looking bleak for clean energy in the US as Congress threatens to shred the Inflation Reduction Act” – had useful stuff on the Big Beautiful Bill and so on. A new four letter acronym for you – FEOC – Foreign Entity Of Concern.

Finally, and best of all is the Los Angeles Review of Books “radio hour” on “Writing Climate Fictions” from August 2024 (so, before the Pallisades etc burnt).

It was a panel with David Wallace-Wells, Jenny Offill, Bharat Venkat, and Jonathan Blake.

There was a shout out to an interesting sounding novel called Denial by John Raymond.

They chewed on various topics of course. This included hypocrisy at one point and how it is used to deflect, but didn’t (understandably because they have never heard of it) use the concept (okay MY concept) of the “Hypocrite-Zealot Trap.

Categories
Podcasts

Podcasts about climate change – some brilliant, some mid, one lousy (anon).

The moorhens on the canal aren’t going to feed themselves. Well, of course they are, but I want to feed them more, and watch tiny smudges (as my wife and I call them) become adolescents and then moorhens themselves. And this I do, almost daily. Which means I am listening to moor (geddit?) podcasts. And among those, some on climate change, which has become unavoidable. And here, as a “public service”, a bit of a shout out to them, some brief reviews (other podcast reviews can be found here). PLEASE SHARE YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS!

I’ve structured this below from the very best to the okay (ymmv!) to the ugh.

Boiling Point (LA Times) The Fake News Pipeline

The other Boiling Point podcasts by the engaging Sammy Roth I had listened to were okay to good, but this one was simply excellent. Pink slime journalism, news mirages etc – Miranda Green is clearly a good journo, and a good interviewee.

Another Boiling Point, about “Hot takes about climate journalism” was also fine, with interviewee Sadie Babits. But didn’t historicise enough (e.g. the late Ross Gelbspan‘s work in the 1990s?!) or even mention structural pressures such as the Herman and Chomsky propaganda model.

Verdict – Boiling Point should be on your subscribe to list.

American Prestige: LA Fires and Lifeboat Capitalism

really good – Hamilton Nolan is clearly worth reading – but no historical context – (e.g. on re-insurers in 1990s).

Buut the fierce intelligence and humanity of the hosts and the interviewee shone through. Given the problem of “The missing institutions” (blog post pending), it’s unsurprising that the “what is to be done?” was cringe – “er, join union and vote for better politicians.”

See also the classic 2004 article Onion article “Libertarian reluctantly calls fire department”

American Prestige: Capitalism and Fire in the 19th Century with with Daniel Immerwahr

This as another really good one (or the bit I could listen to was). Immerwahr has a recent academic essay All That Is Solid Bursts into Flame: Capitalism and Fire in the Nineteenth-Century United States(For those not in the know, this is a riff on a quote by Karl Marx about how capitalism’s creative/destructive dynamics were leading to situations where “all that is solid melts into air.” It’s a dog whistle for radicals).

He also shouted out to Stephen J Pine.

Immerwahr has a fascinating essay about Frank Herbert’s Dune

London Review of Books: Have we surrendered to climate change

Brett Christophers interviewed on the book Overshoot by Andreas Malm and Wim Carton, which he had reviewed for the LRB (see here).

Yeah. It was fine for what it as, for as far as these people can think. But to pick up on specifics – at 16 mins 30 seconds they allude to consumers not citizens but don’t pick up on the decades long politicide of the west. I know Jurgen has blotted his copybook of late, but the basic tools for thinking about civil society, and the colonisation of the Lifeworld are WORTH USING.

Nonetheless, the podcast is good on the farce that is Negative Emissions Technologies and the career imperatives that “force” academics to pretend its a real thing.. Very weak on what to do differently – again, the missing institutions…

What’s Wrong with Democracy: Episode 18 Climate Change

So, this had someone talking – without much hesitancy – about “social tipping point” – hmmm. Then a Global Witness guy dating the problems of international climate diplomacy to the first COP in Berlin in 1995, when the real major defeats for the planet were dished out in the period 1991-2, and that is really really important to understand. There was . Good stuff on Ukraine and oil prices (the West basically choosing to keep the latter low, and chiding/withdrawing support if Ukraine’s actions got close to raising them). It all got a bit hopey changey in the final bit. No mention of civil society institutions. Can’t really recommend. Was relatively empty of any deep content (and yes, in half an hour that is possible)

Finally, there was a truly terrible one about “are we fucked?” (part of a climate podcast – not the one called “Are we f*cked,”, which I haven’t listened to) that was basically unlistenable – I got to the end, but only just, and deserve a medal.

I swear, people who think that they are good at giving an explanation of what is going on to a complete “know nothing” and then their explanation is garbled, with loads of assumed knowledge and no vivid images, metaphors or anything. Ugh. Just ugh.

Categories
Podcasts

May 28, 2025 – signs of the times

You can listen to this here (NB Terrible Sound Quality – if/when I do actual podcasting I will have to get some proper kit!)

May 28, 2025, with the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide at 430ppm, up from 315ppm in 1958.

Three pieces of news today tell you everything you need to know about the planet and the prospects for our species.  Taking them in turn – physical, government-capital and “resistance”.

The physical news first. 

As Madeline Cuff, writing for the New Scientist reports

The world could see its first year of warming above 2°C by the end of the decade, leading climate scientists have warned for the first time…. The chances of seeing a year above 2°C of warming are still very slim, with the WMO/Met Office team estimating the probability at 1 per cent. 

She quotes Leon Hermanson of the Met Office as saying “It’s exceptionally unlikely, but it could happen”

It was the WMO – the World Meteorological Organisation that coordinated the use of satellites and other forms of data collection. In the mid1970s it was a key node in international cooperation and discussion of carbon dioxide build-up. The WMO hosted the First World Climate Conference in February 1979. It  could and should have been a turning point in the way politicians thought about atmospheric pollution.  Almost ten years later it was – along with the United Nations Environment Program – co-founder of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 

One of life’s mild coincidences is that 35 years ago today Working Group 1 of the IPCC released its first report on the science of climate change.

The government capital nexus

To the surprise of precisely no-one, in Australia, the Federal Labor government led by Anthony Albanese has said yes to climate chaos, by granting an extension to Woodside’s North West Shelf project. As per the Australia Institute, this is a disaster on five fronts.

The ALP was recently returned to office in Australia, with the overt climate denialists of the Coalition punished by voters. However, given decisions like these, one cannot but be reminded of the mournful closing lines of George Orwell’s Animal Farm – so spoilers – 

“The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.”

Resistance

Thirteen years ago the UK commentator George Monbiot asked the right question.  In an article called “The Mendacity of Hope” he wrote

“So this is the great question of our age: where is everyone? The monster social movements of the 19th century and first 80 years of the 20th have gone, and nothing has replaced them. Those of us who still contest unwarranted power find our footsteps echoing through cavernous halls once thronged by multitudes“

In late 2018 a new group – “Extinction Rebellion” – made a splash with a declaration of rebellion in Parliament Square in London and then the occupation of five bridges across the Thames. A “rebellion “in London in April 2019 gained a lot of press attention, but a follow-up in October 2019 was less successful and the wheels were wobbling, if not yet actually coming off. 2020 saw COVID and also offshoots from XR – a “Pink Party”, Insulate Britain and then, in 2022, “Just Stop Oil.” High profile arrestable actions followed, as did media smears and police and security service activity.  Many JSO activists have gone to jail. JSO has recently announced it is ceasing its activity. However, the past is not even the past. 

As the BBC’s Laura O’Neill reports

“Four Just Stop Oil protesters who were planning to glue themselves to the taxiway at Manchester Airport have been jailed.

Officers arrested Indigo Rumbelow, Margaret Reid, Leanorah Ward and Daniel Knorr as they were making their way to the airport on 4 August 2024.

They were equipped with heavy-duty bolt-cutters, angle grinders, glue, sand, Just Stop Oil high-visibility vests and a leaflet containing instructions to follow when interacting with police.

All four were found guilty of conspiracy to intentionally cause a public nuisance and jailed at Manchester Minshull Crown Court for between 18 and 30 months. Additionally, they were each fined £2,000.

So what can we expect?

We can expect more temperature records to fall. It would be no surprise to me at all to see us breach two degrees by 2030, though I suspect that won’t actually happen until, say 2035.  What does this mean? It means that the second half of the twenty-first century will make the first half of the twentieth look like a golden age of peace, love and understanding. 

We can expect more extractive capitalism projects to be given approval by supine/captured governments (though one should resist the illusions of a golden age -elected and unelected policymakers are almost always and everywhere mere meat puppets for whoever has the most money. It can be more complicated than that, but it usually isn’t.)

And given that the consequences of our species’ failure to act on scientists’ warnings are clear to all but those most determined to deny reality, we can expect more resistance.

The failure, over the last thirty five years of citizens in the West – with freedom of speech, assembly and information – to build strong, determined and resilient social movements and civil society organisations is a fascinating puzzle. Or perhaps a mundane puzzle, made fascinating by the consequences of the failure.  

In any case, despite the jailings, expect  more resistance at some point – which is not to say that that resistance will be any more effective than what has gone on these last thirty six years, as annual carbon dioxide emissions went up by almost 70 per cent and the atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide rose from roughly 350 parts per million to the current level of 430ppm.

Categories
Podcasts

Podcasts/interview/book alert – Sarah Schulman on AIDS, activism, the fantasy and necessity of solidarity etc

If you are looking for earned activist wisdom, about what solidarity is, what tenacity and courage are, then I have good news; Sarah Schulman.

Here’s an interview about her new book

Here’s the details of her new book, the Fantasy and Necessity of Solidarity.

Here’s an interview with the New York Times podcast, where she points out that solidarity is about the infrastructure of dissent/resistance in the future, not solving the problem in the here and now.

Here’s a 2022 interview with Novara Media about a host of things, including her 2012 book “Gentrification of the Mind.”

I have downloaded a bunch more podcasts and will add them to this list once I have listened.

As per the Wikipedia entry, Schulman has written a lot of novels etc, and I also need to look at those and her ACTUP oral history project.

Update 22 May 2025

Here’s an interview with the folks at How to Survive the End of the World

And with the Los Angeles Review of Books

(you probably only need to listen to one of these two – lots of overlap, understandably).

Here is an insightful and critical review of the book, also at the LARB by Joshua Gutterman Tranen.

And here is a blistering blog post from someone who is, ah, not a fan of Schulman’s (writing) style, while agreeing with the basic premises of “Conflict is not abuse” – or at least the steelman version of it.

https://thingofthings.substack.com/p/conflict-is-not-abuse-review-wow

Categories
Podcasts

Podcast Review: Tipping Point on The Limits to Growth. LISTEN NOW FOR THE LOVE OF GAIA

Podcasts come in all shapes and sizes. Short, pointed and single-header stuff (take a bow Alex Steffen). Looooong, not quite as insightful as it thinks it is, single-or-multi-header (you know who you are – as in, if you think this is about your podcast, it probably is).

Rarely do you come across a podcast that hits the trifecta

a) about a really important topic

b) not a second shorter or longer than it needs to be

c) super use of archival audio.

The Tipping Point series, a three-parter on the origins, reception and after life of the Club of Rome’s The Limits to Growth report is all of those and more. LISTEN TO IT NOW FOR THE LOVE OF GAIA.

It is what popular education should be, but so often isn’t.

Would I have put a bit more in there at the beginning about previous efforts to raise environmental alarm? Yes, but thank goodness I was not running the podcast, because it would have dragged the whole thing down. There could be a different podcast about that, the “before the Limits to Growth” – from, say, Malthus, through Vogt and Osborn to Carson and on to Ehrlich. That I would listen to. For now, though…


LISTEN TO IT NOW FOR THE LOVE OF GAIA.

Categories
Podcasts

Podcasts review: Ice-free Arctic days by 2030? and the meaning(s) of crisis

The moorhens are hatching (producing what the wife and I call “smudges”- impossibly cute round balls of feathers that can zip along). Therefore, the usually-daily canal walk becomes mandatory. Therefore, more podcasts will be listened to. And reviewed.

But the first today was one I listened to while doing some grunt work at the computer. It’s part of the well-established and very deservedly successful series “Just Have a Think” by Dave Borlace

The episode I listened to was “Hothouse Earth and an Ice-Free Arctic Sea. Starting in 2030?

With the usual good production values, and precision, it outlines a recent paper about when the Arctic might have ice-free days.

The comments are moderated/curated, and therefore worth engaging with. Phase transition indeed…

The second podcast was listened to while hungry moorhens flew at me demanding (and getting) a feed.

It is from the wonderful New Books Network podcasts, and it is an interview with the author of

Against the Crisis:Economy and Ecology in a Burning World By Ståle Holgersen

The interview questions, by Stuti Roy, are fine (though I always think that authors should have their feet held to the fire about what, specifically, the “good guys” have done WRONG or inadequately, and what they need to do differently. UMMV) and the answers considered and well-delivered.

Well worth your time…