Categories
NotClimate

January 20, 1975 – “Kill Whitlam” telegram #NotClimate

On this day, January 12, in 1975

“Kill Whitlam” telegram was by Rupert Murdoch to the editors of his Australian newspapers. He was miffed at not getting more out of Gough Whitlam, the Australian Labor Party leader and Prime Minister, whom he had supported.. 

https://independentaustralia.net/business/business-display/gough-whitlam-and-the-rupert-murdoch-memory-hole,7027

Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were at 331 parts per million.

As of 2026 they are 428ppm at and rising rapidly. Enjoy yourself, it’s later than you think. 

Btw, the point(s) of this project is …. the how, the who the hell am I and the what do I currently believe?

The context was that Murdoch hadn’t had his transactional needs met by Whitlam, and was therefore gunning for him. Very old story. 

Why care?

So how would history have turned out any different? Probably not.   

Murdoch is doing a “cheating death” thing, with Lachlan, his mini-me in charge in perpetuity, so that Murdoch and Fox can spew out the bollocks forever. 

What a species, but we’re susceptible to it, the bollocks.

We just don’t know which buttons to push to collaborate. “They” know how to get us to hate.

They know how to get us to disdain and disparage – and to end coalitions before they even begin.

And you know, we need to remember this, that the power of the media, if they “pay the truth makers” against any political move that they even perceive to be opposed to their interests.

(How) does it connect to climate change?

The Murdoch media spews an endless vomit-stream of lies, half-truths, smears etc. It didn’t have to be like this….

What happened next

Whitlam was “dismissed”, lost the ensuing election, and the one in 1977. “Labor” regained office in 1983, under the neoliberals Hawke and Keating. That was pretty much the end for social democracy in Australia.  And here we are.

How does it help us understand the world?

The power of the press…

How does it help us act in the world?

Knowing when (and how) you’re being lied to is useful, imo.

The source that it comes from, if necessary, 

Independent Australia

The other things that you could read about this or watch 

See also the first television adaptation of Chris Mullin’s A Very British Coup with the newspaper proprietor on a sun-lounger in Spain telling his editors in London what the opinion polls were to be flashed on the front page of the newspapers about Prime Minister Harry Perkins. 

What do you think?

If you have opinions or info about this, or other things that happened on this day that are worth knowing, let me know!

Also on this day

Wikipedia

Working Class History

Etc

Categories
Australia

December 16, 2004 – “2 degrees of warming to be a catastrophe”

Nineteen years ago, on this day, December 16, 2004, we got another warning.

SCIENTISTS have warned of the catastrophic consequences of a 2C rise in global temperatures.

They say it could threaten Latin American water supplies, cut food yields in Asia and lead to a rise in extreme weather in the Caribbean.

The warnings were issued in a report led by a group of European scientists and presented at a UN conference on climate change. It was released as delegates from almost 200 nations refined details of the Kyoto Protocol, a global warming treaty, to be implemented in February.

Hobart Mercury (2004) Just 2C could ruin us Hobart Mercury 16th December

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was roughly 377ppm. As of 2023 it is 420ppm, but check here for daily measures. 

The context was that through the 2000s scientists became more certain and more desperate about the impacts of a rapidly warming world. And some newspapers would pick up on this periodically, although the Hobart Mercury is part of Murdoch’s stable, it for whatever reason had always had slightly more independence (being, I think, the only Murdoch paper that did not support the Iraq War).

What I think we can learn from this

We have known exactly what was coming for us, and we have not acted. Of course unpacking that “we” is crucial. It mostly means our lords and masters…

What happened next

We did not act on this warning and all the other warnings that have come since. There is also such a thing as “too late.”

What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs..