Categories
Australia

September 25, 2010 – Big business tells political meat-puppets – “do what you’re told”

Sixteen years ago, on this day, September 25th, 2010,

BIG business has warned Labor it will escalate a public campaign against the federal government to protect the economy from being damaged by vested interests and ill-considered policy formulation in the new parliament.

A range of chief executives, chairmen and directors canvassed by The Weekend Australian said business leaders had a basic responsibility to step up to fill the policy vacuum left by the unstable political situation.

Kitney, D. and Hepworth, A. 2010. Corporate leaders stepping up. The Australian, 25 September, p1.

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was 390ppm. As of 2026, when this post was published, it is 430ppm. This matters because the more carbon dioxide in the air, the more heat gets trapped. The more heat, the more extreme weather events. You can make it more complicated than that if you want, but really, it’s not. Fwiw, I have a tattoo of the Keeling Curve on my left forearm.

The broader context was that at the big end of town, the miners usually get what they want, especially under Liberal governments, but they sometimes have to work a little bit harder under nominally left wing but actually centrist governments, i.e. Labor.

The specific context was that there had been a federal election, which resulted, unusually, in a hung parliament, i.e. neither of the major parties had the numbers to form a government, and so the situation was politically very fluid and unpredictable, and business could see that it might not get as much of what it wanted as it otherwise might, so here we are. This is democracy, apparently.

What I think we can learn from this is that money rules and expects to rule, and occasionally reminds everyone of this in public.

What happened next Gillard formed a minority government, the price of which was carbon pricing. She introduced the legislation, could have done better presentationally, but it wouldn’t have mattered in the long term, because the Murdoch media was gunning for her. It was an extraordinary time amidst all of this. There was the fact that she was the first and so far only female Prime Minister in Australia, which is pretty damn misogynistic at the best of times. 

On this topic, you might like these other posts on All Our Yesterdays

Xx

References

xx

You can see the chronological list of All Our Yesterdays “on this day” posts here.

What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.

If you want to get involved, let me know.

If you want to invite me on your podcast, that would boost my ego and probably improve the currently pitiful hit-rate on this site (the two are not-unrelated).

Also on this day: 

September 25, 1980 -Reagan turns out to be an ignorant fool. Who knew?

September 25, 1991-  European Commission proposes a carbon tax…

September 25, 1995 – Clean Coal. No, seriously.

September 25, 2003 – Bob Carr “strikes greenhouse deal” with European investors

Categories
Australia

September 25, 1990 – Miners write to Alan Griffiths

Thirty six years ago, on this day, September 25th, 1990,

 Miners write letter to Alan Griffiths, Resources Minister

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was 354ppm. As of 2026, when this post was published, it is 430ppm. This matters because the more carbon dioxide in the air, the more heat gets trapped. The more heat, the more extreme weather events. You can make it more complicated than that if you want, but really, it’s not. Fwiw, I have a tattoo of the Keeling Curve on my left forearm.

The broader context was that the settler colony known as Australia had always been extractivist and relying on export earnings. This used to come from agriculture and sheep. By the 1980s this had turned to minerals exports, coal, iron ore, uranium, and so on.

The specific context was that the Ecologically Sustainable Development policy process was about to start. This had been a quid pro quo between the Hawke Labor government for tacit support and preferences from greenie groups ahead of the 1990 federal election. The big end of town and also the miners union was deeply nervous that Ecologically Sustainable Development might mean some constraints on what they wanted to do, permission for projects and jobs available. This was a real fear, given what had happened in 1989 (or the perception of it) around the pulp mill in Tasmania, etc. So here you see the unions trying to remind the resources minister that there’s going to be a fight and they expect him to fight for them. 

What I think we can learn from this is the species is gonna respond like this. Or rather, maybe it could have been different, but it wasn’t and here we are.

What happened next ESD revealed the intellectual bankruptcy of the fossil fuel interests. They assumed that the whole process would be them dictating their recommendations to the chair of the individual working groups, but it turned out that they didn’t have any ideas or answers, and the environmentalists ran rings around them. Ultimately, however, the ESD was being kneecapped by late 1991 and when Keating took over from Hawke, the whole thing was basically thrown in the bin. 

On this topic, you might like these other posts on All Our Yesterdays

Xx

References

xx

You can see the chronological list of All Our Yesterdays “on this day” posts here.

What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.

If you want to get involved, let me know.

If you want to invite me on your podcast, that would boost my ego and probably improve the currently pitiful hit-rate on this site (the two are not-unrelated).

Also on this day: 

September 25, 1980 -Reagan turns out to be an ignorant fool. Who knew?

September 25, 1991-  European Commission proposes a carbon tax…

September 25, 1995 – Clean Coal. No, seriously.

September 25, 2003 – Bob Carr “strikes greenhouse deal” with European investors

Categories
United States of America

September 25, 1955 – New York Times covers climate warning speech of GE engineer…

Thirty six years ago, on this day, September 25th, 1955,

70 years ago today, a General Electric scientist warned about carbon dioxide build-up  

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was 311ppm. As of 2026, when this post was published, it is 430ppm. This matters because the more carbon dioxide in the air, the more heat gets trapped. The more heat, the more extreme weather events. You can make it more complicated than that if you want, but really, it’s not. Fwiw, I have a tattoo of the Keeling Curve on my left forearm.

The broader context was that Gilbert Plass had made a splash in 1953 and The New York Times was picking up on something that other papers had already covered, John Hutton’s speech, which you can read more about here.  

What I think we can learn from this is that the New York Times was hungry for content and would pick up on what other newspapers had been reporting.

What happened next the Times kept reporting in 1956 and then under Walter Sullivan all through into the 1980s. The Times editorialised about the greenhouse effect, as we then called it in 1981 ran op-eds, and then kept running stories from 1988 onwards. We really cannot say we were not warned.

On this topic, you might like these other posts on All Our Yesterdays

Xx

References

xx

You can see the chronological list of All Our Yesterdays “on this day” posts here.

What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.

If you want to get involved, let me know.

If you want to invite me on your podcast, that would boost my ego and probably improve the currently pitiful hit-rate on this site (the two are not-unrelated).

Also on this day: 

September 25, 1980 -Reagan turns out to be an ignorant fool. Who knew?

September 25, 1991-  European Commission proposes a carbon tax…

September 25, 1995 – Clean Coal. No, seriously.

September 25, 2003 – Bob Carr “strikes greenhouse deal” with European investors

Categories
CO2 Newsletter CO2 Newsletter commentary

“I felt astonished by what Barbat wrote” – ‘Elfdock’ on C02 Newsletter Vol. 3, no. 1

The latest commentary on the CO2 Newsletters comes from my friend Susan, who was ‘elfdock’ on Bluesky until very recently. It’s brilliant.

I was born in 1953, post WW2 years. Society was still very conservative, religion was big. Liberal politician Robert Gordon Menzies was Prime Minister from 1939 to 1941 and from 1949 to 1966. The free-thinking Beatniks, who rejected the conformity and consumerism of mainstream society, were fading out, to be replaced by the Hippies. That was my generation. We had had a gutsful of war and religion and rejected both. My older sister, a beatnik, was a student at Melbourne University, and living in Carlton. She took me to the Vietnam Moratorium rallies in 1965 and onwards. I was very fortunate to have such an intellectual sister, she sent me good books to read. Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, John Griffin’s Black Like Me, Jack Kerouac’s On the Road and Dharma Bums, among others. 

I was living in Balaclava in 1971 when I first saw a visitor wearing a climate change T-shirt. It had a cartoon type drawing on it of a sweating Earth. The words around it said, ‘Mother Earth’s A Bitch And She’s On Heat’. Another time he wore a T-shirt that had a very polluted looking Earth, with an onion line of business men in suits and bowler hats that said, ‘Stop Fucking Mother Earth’. I’m really sorry in hindsight I did not ask him about them, but they certainly stuck in my memory. 

My two daughters grew up going to rallies in the mid and late 1970s. Anti Uranium rallies, Stop The Franklin Dam Rallies. They were huge, 100,000 plus people, probably many more, not accurately reported by the MSM. I met David Bellamy, by accident, while we were walking through the Botanical Gardens after one of these rallies. Sadly he did not talk with us about climate change, because he was a denier. Instead he lectured us about not letting the government close down the free Dental Hospital. While free dental care was important, it was not as important as climate change. At this time Bellamy was one of the best known faces on tv. If he had talked about climate change at the rally, I’m sure many people would have listened and acted to stop it. It was a huge opportunity we missed to save life on Earth, including us.  

I could never understand why the government failed to act to stop climate change. When I saw the ‘Mother Earth’s A Bitch And She’s On Heat’ T-shirt in 1971 I didn’t fully realise what I was looking at. Apparently there was a professor teaching his students about climate change at Monash University. If he knew, then I’m sure the government knew. To me, it was logical that the government should have educated us, as it did later, with the hole in the ozone layer. But our government was bought and owned by the fossil fuel industry, we didn’t have a hope in hell. And hell is certainly on the way in the near future.

Reading Barbat’s 1981 newsletter, was an eye opener to how governments and scientists refused to act on the CO2 problem. Instead of stopping the use of fossil fuels and switching to renewables, they decided to wait and see until there might be an effect in early 2010/20. By then it was too late to do anything, except, perhaps, mitigate some of the worst effects for coming generations. In 2026 some of the largest fossil fuel projects were given approval in Australia. Many of the young people say they will not be having children because of climate change.

I felt astonished by what Barbat wrote. The level of stupidity by the governments running our only life support system failed miserably. That emails of climate scientists were hacked, selectively edited and then printed in the gutter press, (especially Murdoch), driving some scientist to near suicide, horrifying. Choosing to breed animals that could withstand climate change, instead of stopping it, stupid. Genetically modifying, and taking out illegal patents on seeds stolen from arid countries, anything was better than treating our biosphere with respect.

The First Nations Peoples here have lived with, and in, their environment for 50,000 years at least. They have nurtured and been part of it, instead of thinking of themselves as superior to it. Western people call them ‘primitive’. Since the Industrial Revolution in about 1750 we have almost managed to destroy the entire environmental system that supports life on our planet.  The Fafocene is well and truly on the way.

Categories
United States of America

 September 24, 1956 – Roscoe Fleming on “Carbon Dioxide Weather” in the Baltimore Sun

Seventy years ago, on this day, September 24th, 1956, the Baltimore Sun ran a p.24 article on “Carbon Dioxide Weather.”

It began “A growing group of American physicists is wondering whether the world’s warming up spell since 1900 may not become permanent, due to man’s own activities.”

It’s mostly based on Gilbert Plass, but also this

“Dr Joseph Kaplan, also formerly at the Hopkins and now at UCLA points out that the rate [of adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere] is increasingly steeply with world industrialisation; he thinks the net addition may be as much as 175,000,000,000 tons in twenty years.”

FWIW, the amount of carbon dioxide being tipped into the air in 1976 was…18bn tonnes…

Global CO2 emissions by year 1940-2025| Statista 

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was 312ppm. As of 2026, when this post was published, it is 430ppm. This matters because the more carbon dioxide in the air, the more heat gets trapped. The more heat, the more extreme weather events. You can make it more complicated than that if you want, but really, it’s not. Fwiw, I have a tattoo of the Keeling Curve on my left forearm.

The broader context was that there had been some awareness of the world warming up, and also the various theories that might explain it. However, there was no real certainty, and there still wasn’t in ‘56. But what you had since 1953 was Gilbert Plass and others talking about carbon dioxide build-up as a likely reason.

The specific context was that the year before Fleming’s newspaper article John Hutton, the general electric engineer, had given a talk, which had been picked up by many American newspapers, Gilbert Plass was publishing and also Roger Revelle was using the possibility of carbon dioxide build up as a way of getting money out of the International Geophysical Year Fund funders, i.e. the US taxpayer. This was the Baltimore Sun, so Fleming had access to Plass, who was at Johns Hopkins – or had been – and the Baltimore Sun had covered Plass’s 1953 talks, so it would have been in the morgue. 

What I think we can learn from this is that from the mid 1950s articles about carbon dioxide build up were appearing in newspapers, this was not a state secret.

What happened next Fleming wrote some more articles. The IGY happened. Carbon dioxide build-up was talked about in the 1950s. People knew.

On this topic, you might like these other posts on All Our Yesterdays

Xx

References

xx

You can see the chronological list of All Our Yesterdays “on this day” posts here.

What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.

If you want to get involved, let me know.

If you want to invite me on your podcast, that would boost my ego and probably improve the currently pitiful hit-rate on this site (the two are not-unrelated).

Also on this day: 

September 24, 1970 – driving around London….

September 24, 1989 – Petra Kelly disses the Australian Prime Minister

September 24, 1991 – Australian denialist gives “Greenhouse Myths” seminar.

September 24, 1993 – A museum exhibition travels to Pittsburgh

September 24, 2006 – “Plane Stupid” holds first action, with “Sermon on the Taxiway” at East Midlands Airport

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was 312ppm. As of 2026, when this post was published, it is 430ppm. This matters because the more carbon dioxide in the air, the more heat gets trapped. The more heat, the more extreme weather events. You can make it more complicated than that if you want, but really, it’s not. Fwiw, I have a tattoo of the Keeling Curve on my left forearm.

The broader context was that there had been some awareness of the world warming up, and also the various theories that might explain it. However, there was no real certainty, and there still wasn’t in ‘56. But what you had since 1953 was Gilbert Plass and others talking about carbon dioxide build-up as a likely reason.

The specific context was that the year before Fleming’s newspaper article John Hutton, the general electric engineer, had given a talk, which had been picked up by many American newspapers, Gilbert Plass was publishing and also Roger Revelle was using the possibility of carbon dioxide build up as a way of getting money out of the International Geophysical Year Fund funders, i.e. the US taxpayer. This was the Baltimore Sun, so Fleming had access to Plass, who was at Johns Hopkins – or had been – and the Baltimore Sun had covered Plass’s 1953 talks, so it would have been in the morgue. 

What I think we can learn from this is that from the mid 1950s articles about carbon dioxide build up were appearing in newspapers, this was not a state secret.

What happened next Fleming wrote some more articles. The IGY happened. Carbon dioxide build-up was talked about in the 1950s. People knew.

On this topic, you might like these other posts on All Our Yesterdays

Xx

References

xx

You can see the chronological list of All Our Yesterdays “on this day” posts here.

What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.

If you want to get involved, let me know.

If you want to invite me on your podcast, that would boost my ego and probably improve the currently pitiful hit-rate on this site (the two are not-unrelated).

Also on this day: 

September 24, 1970 – driving around London….

September 24, 1989 – Petra Kelly disses the Australian Prime Minister

September 24, 1991 – Australian denialist gives “Greenhouse Myths” seminar.

September 24, 1993 – A museum exhibition travels to Pittsburgh

September 24, 2006 – “Plane Stupid” holds first action, with “Sermon on the Taxiway” at East Midlands Airport

Categories
Uncategorized

El Nino blog #01 – the end of “Permanent Global Summertime” ?

Every Sunday, at least until at least the end of October – I am doing a weekly “El Nino” digest (first one here) – for reasons.  Some of the stuff I encounter just has to be blogged, so every Wednesday I will put up something, usually based on something I’ve encountered while looking at stuff that does or doesn’t go in the digest. Below is the first.

Whatever does and doesn’t happen in the course of 2027, whether the physical/political/economic impacts are beyond belief or merely really bad, I think that 2027 will spell the end of an illusion some of us have been Labor/Labouring under –  that sooner or later we will return to the “good old days” of stable economic growth – a chicken in every pot and some sunny uplands. 

As someone said, (it may have been Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor on the Chris Hayes podcast, or maybe it was someone on the American Prestige podcast, idk – there was a time that the fash would promise their followers good things, material things – things that they’d looted from, say, the Jews, or there would the promise of farming land that had been stolen from the Slavs. But now, not so much – it’s just straight displaced hate and “owning the libs”. 

FWIW, IMO, they don’t need to promise anything else, because organised labour big enough to force them into those promises?  (As per Anton Jager, the subject of a perceptive book review in the early September Private Eye, are they really fascists, if you define fascism as a response to a credible  threat of socialism?)

Anyway, for once I have digressed. Fwiw, I think we’ll all get a lesson in some of Barry Commoner‘s four laws from his 1971 book “The Closing Circle: Nature, Man and Technology.”

  1. Everything is connected to everything else,
  2. Everything must go somewhere,
  3. Nature knows best, and
  4. Nothing comes from nothing.

(see Footnote 1 – for once it’s worth your time).

Re laws 1 and 4 –

There is a fantastic and terrifying interview with a food security expert in . Nightmare fuel, you’re welcome.

Meanwhile, as far as UK readers are concerned, it might be the end of mangoes on Christmas Day (2). In an Observer article, the hack interviews a couple of people in a position to know about supply chains for discretionary food spending in the UK. 

Julian Marks, the chief executive of Barfoots, which supplies retailers with vegetables ranging from sweetcorn to aubergines, said: “We run relay races around the world to ensure consistent availability and quality of produce.” Yields of asparagus from Peru are now down 25%, Marks said, and the vegetables are of poorer quality. “They have less shelf life because the plants are more stressed.”

and

Marks said: “The sense of abundance that we have as consumers today… the removal of seasonality from people’s minds, the idea that you can have a mango on New Year’s Day – that’s something that could disappear.”

And

Christian Jaccarini, economist at the Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit, said  “The inflationary pressures are still there, but much of it is being absorbed upstream for now, meaning this wave of inflation has likely been delayed rather than avoided.”

What this put me in mind of was Joanna Blythman’s  (not Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall!)’s concept of Permanent Global Summertime. You have to be my age or older to remember when seasons were reflected on supermarket shelves (nd I only just remember it, and that’s probably because I lived in the end of a supply chain – Adelaide. If I’d been in the metropole, maybe I’d need to be a few years older still.) 

Anyway, the point is that we “conquered” the seasons, or rather, we gave ourselves the illusion of having conquered the seasons. How did we do it? We used congealed sunlight from millions of years ago. We fed that into the tanks of metal birds of our own invention and flew farm produce around the world.  There aren’t many songs about this, strangely, but I am fond of T. V. Smith’s effort his song “Free World” from his impossibly good album “March of the Giants” – 

“you can force it drug it and exhaust it, pick the fruit of the rape of the land”

It is going to become implausible, impossible to sustain Permanent Global Summertime quite soon (3).

Re law 2 (“Everything must go somewhere”) clock this – 

 from a January 1963 Popular Science, sent to me by a good friend. 

It really captures the assumptions of the 60s that you could just dispose of your waste, however, and the earth was so big that it would absorb whatever you did to it. 

And the first successful push against that was Rachel Carson in 1962 with her Silent Spring, and of course she was denounced as a communist and a lesbian and hysterical and all of the above. 

The Malthusian “resources will run out and we will starve” fears gave way, in the 1970s and 1980s, to the “we will overwhelm the capacity of the planet to act as a garbage dump.” – Ozone, Climate, and here we are. 

References

Vasager, J. 2026. Super El Niño could end the ‘sense of food abundance’ enjoyed by UK consumers. The Observer, Sept 17

Footnotes 

(1) “The four laws of ecology and the four anti-ecological laws of capitalism” of John Bellamy Foster.

    1. The only lasting connection between things is the cash nexus;
    2. It doesn’t matter where something goes as long as it doesn’t reenter the circuit of capital;
    3. The self-regulating market knows best; and
    4. Nature’s bounty is a free gift to the property owner.

    (2) The Telegraph is running something about chocolate or coffee getting more expensive, but a) it’s behind a paywall, and b)  Axel Springer], 

    (3) During the Berlin airlift (1948-9) they were actually flying in coal, It made up 65% of the tonnage flown in, which is, I mean, just astonishing.

    What do you think? Does this make any sense? Does it spark any thoughts, connections of your own?

    Categories
    United Kingdom

    September 23, 1983 – Royal Society Members protest Thatcher’s Admission

    Forty three years ago, on this day, September 23rd, 1983,

    Forty-four members of the Royal Society, the world’s oldest scientific academy, have protested the election of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher as a fellow, claiming her cost-cutting government has damaged science in Britain.

    A spokesman for the 968-member academy confirmed press reports Friday that 44 fellows, including six Nobel laureates, wrote the society’s president, Sir Andrew Huxley, saying the Conservative prime minister’s election to the academy implied “support of a political position.”

    Anon, 1983. Royal Society Members Protest Thatcher’s Admission. The Associated Press, September 23,

    The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was 343ppm. As of 2026, when this post was published, it is 430ppm. This matters because the more carbon dioxide in the air, the more heat gets trapped. The more heat, the more extreme weather events. You can make it more complicated than that if you want, but really, it’s not. Fwiw, I have a tattoo of the Keeling Curve on my left forearm.

    The broader context was the Royal Society has been around for literally centuries.  

    The specific context was was that Margaret Thatcher had some training as a chemist, and it was politically astute in the context of trying to keep the science budget protected to offer her membership of, or fellowship, or whatever you want to call it, of the Royal Society, not on the basis of any great scientific accomplishment, but just from straightforward emotional bribe around politics viewpoint. 

    What I think we can learn from this is that honorary fellowship membership, whatever, of these organisations is contested.

    What happened next Thatcher got the bribe. In 1988 gave a speech about the science budget, but also about climate change at Fishmongers Hall.

    In 2006 the Royal Society wrote an unusual public letter telling Exxon to knock it off with the climate denial. 

    Of late the controversy has been around Elon Musk and whether his fellowship of the Royal Society should be removed for, well, countless reasons. 

    On this topic, you might like these other posts on All Our Yesterdays

    Xx

    References

    xx

    You can see the chronological list of All Our Yesterdays “on this day” posts here.

    What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.

    If you want to get involved, let me know.

    If you want to invite me on your podcast, that would boost my ego and probably improve the currently pitiful hit-rate on this site (the two are not-unrelated).

    Also on this day: 

    September 23, 1986 -Joe Biden suggests urgent #climate action…

    September 23, 2007 – “Climate “clever” fools no-one…

    September 23, 2013 – Media Watch versus climate denialists …

    September 23, 2014 – Obama gives a wonderful speech about climate change. We are saved.

    September 23, 2022 – Ad company says no to fossil fuels (spoilers -no, it doesn’t)

    Categories
    Australia International processes UNFCCC

    September 22, 1992 – “Greenhouse beyond Rio”

    Thirty four years ago, on this day, September 22nd, 1992,

     Greenhouse Beyond Rio: A Two-day Conference on the Greenhouse Effect ;  Sir Robert Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, London, 22 – 23 September 1992 ; 

    The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was 356ppm. As of 2026, when this post was published, it is 430ppm. This matters because the more carbon dioxide in the air, the more heat gets trapped. The more heat, the more extreme weather events. You can make it more complicated than that if you want, but really, it’s not. Fwiw, I have a tattoo of the Keeling Curve on my left forearm.

    The broader context was that the greenhouse effect problem had become an issue in 1988. And the politicians had wrangled. And, ultimately, the United States’ position of “no targets and timetables for emissions reductions by rich nations or we are boycotting the Earth Summit” had prevailed. The UNFCCC text was a slow-motion suicide note.

    So people were holding post-Rio Earth Summit meetings and putting on a brave face, wanting to believe, wanting to pretend, wanting other people to believe that an important landmark had been passed, and that there was going to be actual climate action.

    But anyone who had witnessed previous rounds of the kayfabe will have known that this was all bullshit. I doubt many people were willing to say it out in public because that’s career-limiting or career-ending, and why piss on everyone else’s chips, I guess? Let them believe whatever deluded shite they want to believe. It doesn’t really matter anymore. 

    What I think we can learn from this the kayfabe caravan must roll on…

    What happened next. Well, you’re living with the consequences, consequences of it, 34 years of increased emissions, and therefore increased atmospheric concentrations, and therefore heat trapped, and therefore extreme weather events, and therefore climatic changes. Welcome to the Fafocence, I hope you enjoy the show.

    On this topic, you might like these other posts on All Our Yesterdays

    Xx

    References

    xx

    You can see the chronological list of All Our Yesterdays “on this day” posts here.

    What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.

    If you want to get involved, let me know.

    If you want to invite me on your podcast, that would boost my ego and probably improve the currently pitiful hit-rate on this site (the two are not-unrelated).

    Also on this day: 

    September 22, 1955 – a General Electric scientist warned about carbon dioxide build-up

    September 22, 1971 – Australian communist talks about climate change

    September 22, 1991 – ESD RIP. Australia’s chance of a different future… squashed flat.

    September 22, 1994 – another “sky will fall” report

    September 22, 2005 – IPCC CCS special report

    September 22, 2014 – “We Mean Business” coalition formed

    Categories
    CO2 Newsletter

    “CO2 continues skyward” – CO2 Newsletter Vol. 3, No. 1, Nov-Dec 1981

    The thirteenth edition of the CO2 Newsletter, (Vol. 3, no. 1, Nov-Dec 1981) published bi-monthly by American geologist William N. Barbat between 1979 and 1982 is live. You can download a pdf and see the full text here – CO2 Newsletter Vol 3, No 1

    The eight page issue has a front page story pointing out that “CO2 Continues Skyward”  and that the Antarctic ice was shrinking and the Arctic warming.

    Yes, 1981, before many of you doomed-youth were born.

    Read it and boggle at Barbat’s prescience and hard-graft. That he failed to warn us all was not on him. Goddam what a bunch of hairless murder apes (feeling particularly doomy at mo, ignore me).

    The rest of the issue is what you’ll have come to expect – quotes, carefully curated excerpts of recent reports. All horrible stuff to read in 2026, but you have to admire the man’s efforts.

    Categories
    International processes Science World Meteorological Organisation

    September 21, 1978 – Draft Agreement between WMO and ICSU

    Forty eight years ago, on this day, September 21st, 1978,

    Draft Agreement between WMO and ICSU re: climate research programme

    https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/toward-a-u-s-climate-program-plan-comprehensive-review-and-recommendations-from-the-1978-workshop/289538439#88

    The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was 335ppm. As of 2026, when this post was published, it is 430ppm. This matters because the more carbon dioxide in the air, the more heat gets trapped. The more heat, the more extreme weather events. You can make it more complicated than that if you want, but really, it’s not. Fwiw, I have a tattoo of the Keeling Curve on my left forearm.

    The broader context was that the World Meteorological Organisation had been beavering away on any number of issues, but a subgroup had in 1976 come out in favour of a warming world, because of carbon dioxide build up. This had been reported in the Times, and here we see the agreement for a kind of successor programme to the GARP in the lead up to and to be agreed at the first World Climate Conference to be held in Geneva in February of 1979.

    The specific context was that the reports and conferences about carbon dioxide build-up were beginning to come quicker.

    What I think we can learn from this is that the wheels of the bureaucracy go round and round, they grind very fine, but you’re not going to get big research programmes funded unless you do things like this, draft programmes, revised drafts, etc.

    What happened next. The First World Climate Conference happened. It was not the pivotal moment it could have been. The problem did not become a public issue until 1988.

    On this topic, you might like these other posts on All Our Yesterdays

    Xx

    References

    xx

    You can see the chronological list of All Our Yesterdays “on this day” posts here.

    What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.

    If you want to get involved, let me know.

    If you want to invite me on your podcast, that would boost my ego and probably improve the currently pitiful hit-rate on this site (the two are not-unrelated).

    Also on this day: 

    September 21, 1958, LA Times runs a Greenhouse Cartoon

    September 21, 1990 – Stabilisation in 2005, says the UK

    September 21, 1990 – Ministers call for Toronto Target to be federal policy …

    September 21, 1993 – Manchester says “no, not hot air”. Yeah, right.

    September 21, 2014 – big #climate march in New York. World saved.

    Date for your diary – Sun Day, Sept 21st 2025