Categories
CO2 Newsletter CO2 Newsletter commentary

“I felt astonished by what Barbat wrote” – ‘Elfdock’ on C02 Newsletter Vol. 3, no. 1

The latest commentary on the CO2 Newsletters comes from my friend Susan, who was ‘elfdock’ on Bluesky until very recently. It’s brilliant.

I was born in 1953, post WW2 years. Society was still very conservative, religion was big. Liberal politician Robert Gordon Menzies was Prime Minister from 1939 to 1941 and from 1949 to 1966. The free-thinking Beatniks, who rejected the conformity and consumerism of mainstream society, were fading out, to be replaced by the Hippies. That was my generation. We had had a gutsful of war and religion and rejected both. My older sister, a beatnik, was a student at Melbourne University, and living in Carlton. She took me to the Vietnam Moratorium rallies in 1965 and onwards. I was very fortunate to have such an intellectual sister, she sent me good books to read. Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, John Griffin’s Black Like Me, Jack Kerouac’s On the Road and Dharma Bums, among others. 

I was living in Balaclava in 1971 when I first saw a visitor wearing a climate change T-shirt. It had a cartoon type drawing on it of a sweating Earth. The words around it said, ‘Mother Earth’s A Bitch And She’s On Heat’. Another time he wore a T-shirt that had a very polluted looking Earth, with an onion line of business men in suits and bowler hats that said, ‘Stop Fucking Mother Earth’. I’m really sorry in hindsight I did not ask him about them, but they certainly stuck in my memory. 

My two daughters grew up going to rallies in the mid and late 1970s. Anti Uranium rallies, Stop The Franklin Dam Rallies. They were huge, 100,000 plus people, probably many more, not accurately reported by the MSM. I met David Bellamy, by accident, while we were walking through the Botanical Gardens after one of these rallies. Sadly he did not talk with us about climate change, because he was a denier. Instead he lectured us about not letting the government close down the free Dental Hospital. While free dental care was important, it was not as important as climate change. At this time Bellamy was one of the best known faces on tv. If he had talked about climate change at the rally, I’m sure many people would have listened and acted to stop it. It was a huge opportunity we missed to save life on Earth, including us.  

I could never understand why the government failed to act to stop climate change. When I saw the ‘Mother Earth’s A Bitch And She’s On Heat’ T-shirt in 1971 I didn’t fully realise what I was looking at. Apparently there was a professor teaching his students about climate change at Monash University. If he knew, then I’m sure the government knew. To me, it was logical that the government should have educated us, as it did later, with the hole in the ozone layer. But our government was bought and owned by the fossil fuel industry, we didn’t have a hope in hell. And hell is certainly on the way in the near future.

Reading Barbat’s 1981 newsletter, was an eye opener to how governments and scientists refused to act on the CO2 problem. Instead of stopping the use of fossil fuels and switching to renewables, they decided to wait and see until there might be an effect in early 2010/20. By then it was too late to do anything, except, perhaps, mitigate some of the worst effects for coming generations. In 2026 some of the largest fossil fuel projects were given approval in Australia. Many of the young people say they will not be having children because of climate change.

I felt astonished by what Barbat wrote. The level of stupidity by the governments running our only life support system failed miserably. That emails of climate scientists were hacked, selectively edited and then printed in the gutter press, (especially Murdoch), driving some scientist to near suicide, horrifying. Choosing to breed animals that could withstand climate change, instead of stopping it, stupid. Genetically modifying, and taking out illegal patents on seeds stolen from arid countries, anything was better than treating our biosphere with respect.

The First Nations Peoples here have lived with, and in, their environment for 50,000 years at least. They have nurtured and been part of it, instead of thinking of themselves as superior to it. Western people call them ‘primitive’. Since the Industrial Revolution in about 1750 we have almost managed to destroy the entire environmental system that supports life on our planet.  The Fafocene is well and truly on the way.

Categories
Denial United Nations

May 20, 2010 – climategate keeps delivering for denialists

Thirteen years ago, on this day, May 20, 2010, a bunch of scientists had to waste more of their time answering questions about the theft of emails from a computer server.

2010 The scientists involved in the stolen climate emails from the University of East Anglia were exonerated by the British House of Commons and an international panel of climate experts, led by Lord Oxburgh. Even after these investigations found that nothing in the emails undercut the scientific evidence of climate change, attacks against scientists continue. Reports of harassment, death threats and legal challenges have created a hostile environment, making it challenging for actual data and scientific analyses to reach the public and policymakers.

On Thursday, May 20th, the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming held a hearing to examine the intersection between climate science and the political process. This hearing, entitled “Climate Science in the Political Arena,” featured prominent climate scientists, some of whom have been the target of these attacks. This hearing explored scientists’ ability to present data and information that can guide global warming solutions in a sometimes fierce political landscape.

WHAT: Climate Science in the Political Arena

WHEN: Thursday May 20, 2010, 9:00 AM

WHERE: 1334 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC

OPENING STATEMENT: Chairman Edward J. Markey

WITNESSES:

Dr. Ralph Cicerone, President of the National Academy of Sciences and Chair of the National Research Council

Dr. Mario Molina, Nobel Laureate in Chemistry and Professor, University of California at San Diego

Dr. Stephen Schneider, Professor, Stanford University

Dr. Ben Santer, Research Scientist, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Dr. William Happer, Professor, Princeton University

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was roughly 393.2ppm. As of 2023 it is 420 ppm, but check here for daily measures. 

The context was that shortly before the 2009 Copenhagen Climate Conference, somebody broke into the University of East Anglia servers, downloaded an enormous tranche of communications between various scientists, and then released these as the so-called Climate gate emails, trying to insinuate that there was some scandal. There had been significant fallout. And these hearings were politicians trying to show that they were concerned and figuring out what hadn’t hadn’t happened.  By then, though, and this is the beauty of a smear, the work is actually done. A lie can be halfway around the world, but for the truth has got its boots on.

What I think we can learn from this

Smearing climate scientists is easy. Nobody is able to live their life without making slips that can be magnified, exaggerated truths distorted, etc. 

What happened next? The climategate emails still get trotted out by denialists as proof of the malfeasance of climate scientists and the “corruption” of the science. 

What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong?  Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.