Categories
United Kingdom

November 5, 1989 – “UK hinders move to halt global warming”

Thirty seven years ago, on this day, November 5th, 1989,

UK hinders moves to halt global warming

Geoffrey Lean and Jan Sinclair in the Observer

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was 353ppm. As of 2026, when this post was published, it is 430ppm. This matters because the more carbon dioxide in the air, the more heat gets trapped. The more heat, the more extreme weather events. You can make it more complicated than that if you want, but really, it’s not. Fwiw, I have a tattoo of the Keeling Curve on my left forearm.

The broader context was that Margaret Thatcher had been briefed repeatedly on carbon dioxide build up, for example, 1979 and 1984 and had persistently and consistently said, I’m not interested, you want me to worry about the weather. 

The specific context was that in the second half of 1988 Crispin Tickell finally convinced her it was a serious issue, and she could see the writing on the wall, and she performed one of her many turns, because the lady was indeed for turning. She gave a speech in September 1988 which really kick-started the whole climate issue, which was already underway – for example, the conference in Toronto. Thatcher was doing what politicians do, getting ahead of an issue that was already starting anyway. In May of 1989 President Bush was forced to change his tune and talk about, yes, the need for an actual carbon treaty. Here we see a few months later, the Energy Minister  Baroness INSERT NAME had kiboshed the Toronto target.

What I think we can learn from this is that the UK is very good at talking the talk of justice, equality, fairness, etc. Slightly less good at walking the walk.

What happened next. The UK didn’t even put climate change on the literal agenda when it hosted the G7 in 1991 because this was going to offend President Bush. They are very much the “junior partner”, and they were the ones who negotiated the surrender of the pro targets and timetables people in 1992 ahead of the Earth Summit.

On this topic, you might like these other posts on All Our Yesterdays

Xx

References

xx

You can see the chronological list of All Our Yesterdays “on this day” posts here.

What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.

If you want to get involved, let me know.

If you want to invite me on your podcast, that would boost my ego and probably improve the currently pitiful hit-rate on this site (the two are not-unrelated).

Also on this day: 

60 years ago today, the first US government report to warn about climate change was published.

November 5, 1969 – House of Lords question about the greenhouse effect

November 5, 1992 – Jeremy Leggett calls Australian petrol price cuts “insane”

November 5, 1997 – Global Climate Coalition co-ordinates an anti-Kyoto conference

November 5, 2008 – Queen asks the key question

November 5, 2014 – Vince Cable and the Energy Trilemma

Categories
United Kingdom

March 19, 1989 – “Ministers delay plans to curb climate danger”

On this day, thirty seven years ago “Ministers delay plans to curb climate danger” 

GEOFFREY LEAN Environment Correspondent

The Observer  March 19, 1989.

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air was roughly 353ppm. As of 2026 it is 428ppm, but check here for daily measures. 

The broader context was that scientists had been warning since the mid-late 1970s that there was serious trouble ahead.

The specific context was that the climate issue had exploded in September 1988 thanks in part to Margaret Thatcher’s speech at the Royal Society. In response, green groups had thrown down what they called the “Green Gauntlet,” 20 policy proposals; Thatcher had basically blanked it. And now we see this report that ministers delay plans to curb climate danger

 What I think we can learn from this is that it’s easy to say something is an issue and get plaudits, but then when people say, what are you going to do about it, it begins to get awkward, doesn’t it? The management of the climate issue as a political problem, rather than a civilizational one, kicked in because it is the perfect super-wicked problem in terms of distributed responsibility, uncertainty, long term effects, etc, and the problem of free riders, all the rest of it. 

What happened next  Well, in the UK, there was Thatcher’s 1989 Cabinet meeting in April. Then the UNFCCC process kicked in. And so on.

What do you think? Does this pass the ‘so what?’ threshold? Have I got facts wrong? Interpretation wrong? Please do comment on this post, unless you are a denialist, obvs.

References

Xxx

Also on this day: 

March 19, 1956 – Washington Post reports Revelle’s statements

March 19, 1970 – first warning in Australian parliament about carbon dioxide build-up 

March 19, 1990 – Bob Hawke gives #climate speech

March 19, 1998 – industry cautiously welcoming emissions trading…

 March 19, 2001 – US Secretary of Energy boasts about all the coal plants he will build (doesn’t).